No fluff, no filler—just practical insights, real stories, and expert advice for freight brokers and agents.
welcome to the somerset blog
Somerset Logistics
by
July 27, 2026 4:45 am
A 70% split is only 70% if nothing comes out of it afterward. This field guide covers where freight agent program fees hide: conditional software charges, compliance chargebacks, credit-check fees, and the exact questions that surface them in writing before you sign.
Post Date:

A 70% commission split is only 70% if nothing comes out of it afterward. That’s the entire subject of this guide, because freight agent program fees rarely appear in the recruiting conversation, they appear on your statements, months after you’ve moved your book.
Software charges, compliance chargebacks, fees for credit checks on your own customers – individually, each one looks small, but together, they can quietly turn an advertised 70% into something much less.
If you’re evaluating freight agent programs, here’s a field guide to where fees hide, what each one looks like in the wild, and the exact questions that surface them before you sign.
Brokerages compete loudly on split percentages because splits are easy to compare. Fees are where the comparison gets muddy, and some programs rely on that.
Agents who’ve joined Somerset from other brokerages describe the same pattern again and again: the split was real, but the deductions around it were a surprise. Costs that feel like the brokerage’s cost of doing business – running its software, checking a customer’s credit, verifying compliance details – showed up on the agent’s side of the ledger instead.
None of these fees are illegal, and most are technically disclosed somewhere in the agreement. The problem is that “disclosed somewhere” and “understood before signing” are different things. Hence the field guide.
What it looks like: A monthly charge for the TMS, load boards, or other required systems. The trickier version is conditional: the software is “free” only if you hit revenue benchmarks, and the fee switches on in any month you fall short.
Conditional fees deserve special attention because they invert who carries market risk. In a slow freight market, exactly when your revenue dips, your costs go up. The brokerage’s software bill becomes your problem at the worst possible time.
Ask: Is there any charge, now or conditionally, for the systems I’m required to use? What exactly triggers it, and where is that in the agreement?
What it looks like: Deductions from your commission check for administrative misses, a VIN number not entered, a verification step not completed, a document filed late. Agents from other programs describe these being withheld directly from settlement, sometimes without much warning.
Attention to detail matters in freight, and good agents sweat it. But there’s a difference between a brokerage that builds processes to catch small misses and one that monetizes them. A per-infraction chargeback model tells you which kind you’re evaluating.
Ask: Is there any scenario where money is withheld from my commission for administrative or compliance items? Can I see the complete list of chargeback triggers in writing?
What it looks like: A charge every time you ask the brokerage to extend or increase credit for one of your customers. One agent described being charged for each request and needing multiple credit increases on a single growing account, meaning the agent was repeatedly paying fees simply to continue growing the business they were bringing to the brokerage.
Think about the incentive that creates. Your customer is growing. You’re moving more freight, which earns the brokerage more margin, and they’re charging you for it. Credit evaluation is a core brokerage function, it’s how a brokerage protects itself, so a program that bills agents for this is essentially making the agents pay for its own risk management.
Ask: Is there any fee for credit checks, credit increases, or new customer credit setup? Per request or per account?
What it looks like: If a customer doesn’t pay, many programs ultimately charge the loss back to the agent. The key difference is how and when that happens. Some allow more time and flexibility for collection, while others charge back quickly or require escrow deposits or commission reserves.
These policies aren’t necessarily unreasonable, but they’re important economic terms. Agents should understand how long the brokerage works to collect, what support is provided, and when they become responsible for an unpaid balance.
Ask: If a customer doesn’t pay, when does the agent become responsible? What collection efforts happen first? Is any escrow or reserve required?
What it looks like: Insurance deductions, admin fees, onboarding or setup charges, fees for paper checks, charges for early commission access. Individually forgettable; collectively, a second split hiding under the first one.
Ask: Can I see a complete fee schedule, every possible deduction, and a sample settlement statement from a real month?
Here’s an illustrative example, hypothetical numbers, real mechanics.
Say your book generates $20,000 in gross margin in a month, and your program advertises a 70% split: $14,000 to you. Now apply a quiet month of fees: a $400 software charge because you missed the revenue benchmark in a soft market, $120 in compliance chargebacks, and $120 in credit fees for two increase requests on a growing customer. That’s $640, and your effective split just dropped from 70% to about 66.8%.
Run the same month against a program with a true, deduction-free 70%, and the “identical” splits are $640 apart. Over a year, quiet months like that add up to real money, money that never shows up in any recruiting comparison, because the advertised numbers were the same.
The lesson isn’t that fees make a program bad. It’s that you can’t compare freight agent program fees you haven’t seen, so the comparison has to happen in writing, before you sign.
Somerset’s position on fees is simple: costs that belong to running a brokerage stay with the brokerage.
We don’t charge agents for credit checks or credit increases on their customers, and we don’t backcharge for carrier vetting, those are our responsibilities, and our financial stability is exactly what lets us carry them. Your split is meant to be your split.
We’d tell you to verify that in writing during your evaluation, because that’s the entire point of this guide, and it applies to us too.
The best freight agent programs hand over their complete fee terms without flinching, because there’s nothing in them to manage around. Programs that answer fee questions with “let’s circle back to the split” are answering a different question than the one you asked.
If you’re comparing programs right now, our guide to comparing freight agent programs pairs well with this one, and if you’d like to see Somerset’s terms in writing, reach out for a confidential conversation. Bring the questions from this guide. We like agents who ask them.
Common freight agent program fees include software and TMS charges (sometimes conditional on revenue benchmarks), compliance chargebacks deducted from commissions, fees for customer credit checks or increases, bad-debt chargebacks, escrow and claims reserves, insurance deductions, and administrative charges. Not every program uses them, which is why the written fee schedule matters more than the advertised split.
Fees reduce your effective split below the advertised number. A 70% split with a few hundred dollars in monthly deductions can function like a 66–67% split, and conditional fees often hit hardest in slow months, when revenue is already down. Comparing programs accurately means modeling net income after all deductions, not comparing headline percentages.
Credit evaluation protects the brokerage, which carries the payment risk, so many agents view it as a core brokerage cost rather than an agent expense. Programs vary: some absorb it entirely, while others charge per request. Whichever model a program uses, it should be disclosed in writing before you sign.
A compliance chargeback is a deduction from an agent’s commission for an administrative miss, a data field not completed, a verification step skipped, or a document filed late. Some programs use coaching and process to address these; others deduct per incident. Ask for the complete list of chargeback triggers before joining any program.
Request the full fee schedule and a sample settlement statement in writing, search the agent agreement for terms like “chargeback,” “deduction,” “reserve,” and “benchmark,” and ask current agents what appears on their settlements. Independent comparison platforms can add an outside reference point, though their data should be verified too.
Somerset doesn’t charge agents for customer credit checks, credit increases, or carrier vetting, we treat those as brokerage responsibilities. We encourage agents to verify our terms in writing during their evaluation, exactly as this guide recommends for every program.
If you're asking questions like:
It may be worth exploring the somerset difference
FREE RESOURCE
Featured blog post
Featured Posts